Effect of Work Stress and Leader-Member Exchange on Adaptive Performance through Innovative Work Behavior of Generation Z Employees in East Java

Authors

  • Ni Nyoman Asti Stya Putri Universitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Author
    Competing Interests

    Innovative Work Behavior, Work Stress, Leader–Member Exchange, Generation Z.Adaptive Performance,  

  • Shinta Setia Universitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas Author
    Competing Interests

    Innovative Work Behavior, Work Stress, Leader–Member Exchange, Generation Z.Adaptive Performance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37638/bima.7.1.665-676

Keywords:

Innovative Work Behavior, Work Stress, Leader–Member Exchange, Generation Z.Adaptive Performance

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the effect of work stress and leader–member exchange on adaptive performance through the mediating role of innovative work behavior among Generation Z employees, in line with increasing demands for adaptation in a dynamic work environment. Methodology: This study used a quantitative approach through an online questionnaire survey of Generation Z employees in East Java who met the research criteria, resulting in 145 valid responses. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the measurement model and structural model. Results: The results showed that work stress had a significant negative effect on innovative work behavior and adaptive performance, while leader–member exchange had a significant positive effect on both variables. Innovative work behavior was also found to play a significant mediating role in explaining employee adaptability. Findings: Innovative work behavior emerged as a key behavioral mechanism that translates work stress conditions and leadership relationship quality into individual adaptability. Novelty and Originality: This study provides new empirical evidence on the dynamics of Generation Z employee adaptation by placing innovative work behavior as the main psychological channel connecting work demands and leadership resources with adaptive performance, thereby enriching the understanding of behavioral mechanisms in the context of the young workforce. Conclusion: This study concludes that adaptive performance among Generation Z is not directly shaped by work pressure or leadership, but is significantly guided by individual innovation capacity, affirming the central role of innovative work behavior as the primary mechanism for developing workforce adaptability. Type of Paper: Empirical research article.

References

Agung, Y., & Nugroho, W. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review on Workplace Expectations and Behavioral Characteristics of Generation Z Employees Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis tentang Harapan Tempat Kerja dan Karakteristik Perilaku Karyawan Generasi Z. 14(3), 367–375.

Anjum, A., & Zhao, Y. (2022). The Impact of Stress on Innovative Work Behavior among Medical Healthcare Professionals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090340

Ardianto, B., & Suharnomo. (2023). Effect of Leader-Member Exchange and Organization Climate towards Public Sector Employee Performance Mediated by Innovative Work Behavior. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 6(2), 2621–606.

Ari, H. O. (2025). Determining the Relationship Between Work Stress and Job Performance : A Cross-Sectional Study Among Healthcare Workers. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/5051149

Bataineh, M. S. E., Zainal, S. R. M., Muthuveloo, R., Yasin, R., Wali, J. Al, & Mugableh, M. I. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance: The role of innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 17(1), 28–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69864/ijbsam.17-1.156

Deloitte. (2024). 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Living and working with purpose in a transforming world. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, 1–37. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/content/genzmillennialsurvey.html

Dodanwala, T. C., Shrestha, P., & Santoso, D. S. (2021). Role Conflict Related Job Stress among Construction Professionals: The Moderating Role of Age and Organization Tenure. Construction Economics and Building, 21(4), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v21i4.7609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v21i4.7609

Ferdinan, B. A. (2023). Transformational Leadership and Job Stress: The Mediating Role of Innovative Work Behavior on Millennial and Z Performance. International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 10(4), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/ijems-v10i4p106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V10I4P106

Ha, J. C. (2022). Capturing Emerging Business Opportunities through Entrepreneurial Orientation and Innovation Behavior: The Moderating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063585

Hair, J. F., C, W., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2021). Multivariate Data Analysis. Andover.

Kaltiainen, J., & Hakanen, J. (2022). Fostering Task and Adaptive Performance Through Employee Well-Being: The Role of Servant Leadership. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981599

Li, J., Liao, Y., Wang, W., Han, X., Cheng, Z., & Sun, G. (2025). Is Stress Always Bad ? The role of Job Stress in Producing Innovative Ideas. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 23(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2219402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2023.2219402

Rafique, M. A., Hou, Y., Chudhery, M. A. Z., Waheed, M., Zia, T., & Chan, F. (2022). Investigating The Impact of Pandemic Job Stress and Transformational Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior: The mediating and Moderating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100214

Saleem, F., Malik, M. I., & Qureshi, S. S. (2021). Work Stress Hampering Employee Performance During COVID-19: Is Safety Culture Needed? Frontiers in Psychology, 12(August), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655839

Stevan E.Hobfoll, Jonathon Halbesleben, Jean-Pierre Neveu, M. W. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context : The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. 103–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Taye, D., & Assefa, S. (2025). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Propensity to Cheat Scale Validation in the Ethiopian Public Higher Education. 1–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.150357.2

Widiastuti, W., & Kusmaryani, R. E. (2023). The Influence of Leader Member Exchange on Innovative Work Behavior (A Study of High School Teachers). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(10), 414. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i10.5186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i10.5186

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Reasearch Paper

How to Cite

Effect of Work Stress and Leader-Member Exchange on Adaptive Performance through Innovative Work Behavior of Generation Z Employees in East Java. (2026). BIMA Journal (Business, Management, & Accounting Journal), 7(1), 665-676. https://doi.org/10.37638/bima.7.1.665-676