Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pengadaan Publik: Meningkatkan Integritas dan Efisiensi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37638/sengkuni.3.2.67-72Keywords:
Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, Pengadaan PublikAbstract
Transparency and accountability play a key role in successful public procurement. This article discusses how increased transparency in the procurement process can lead to higher levels of integrity, while simultaneously improving the efficiency of public resource management. Through a more open and measured approach, governments can minimize the risk of abuse of power, corruption, and wasteful spending, while also strengthening public trust in public institutions. This article highlights the importance of concrete steps to achieve this goal and provides insights into how increased transparency and accountability can be key to success in more dignified and efficient public procurement.
References
Ambarita, P. T., & Suhendra, H. (2018). The Impact of Transparency and Accountability on Public Procurement Performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Procurement, 18(2), 161-185.
Arrowsmith, S. (2015). Public Procurement Law: Damages as an Effective Remedy for Breach of Procurement Rules. Public Procurement Law Review, 24(1), 29-45.
Della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (2018). The Hidden Costs of Relying on Citizens: Public Procurement, Organized Crime, and Anti-Mafia Policy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24(4), 347-366.
Haneveld, H., & Wagenaar, P. (2016). Translating Transparency: The Dutch Way of Open Contracting in Public Procurement. Public Administration, 94(3), 788-805.
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Transparency and Accountability in Innovative Public Procurement. Electronic Government, 15(2), 208-224.
Kelman, S., & Schooner, S. L. (2016). Public Procurement: A Multi-Disciplinary Theory of Negotiation. Journal of Public Procurement, 16(4), 483-520.
Macher, J. T., Mayo, J. W., & Ukhaneva, O. (2018). Auction Format Matters: Evidence on Bidding Behavior and Seller Revenue in Procurement Auctions. Journal of Public Economics, 162, 68-86.
McCrudden, C. (2019). Public Procurement and the Global Compact. In Human Rights and the Global Economy (pp. 271-298). Hart Publishing.
Nielsen, V. L., & Nielsen, S. B. (2016). Public Procurement and Rent-Seeking: The Role of Competitor Identity. European Economic Review, 89, 74-90.
Reischauer, G. (2017). Public Procurement Law in the Twenty-First Century: The Role of Law in Government Procurement Markets. Harvard Law Review, 130(2), 663-720.
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
Saifullah, H., & Arifin, Z. (2017). Public Procurement in Indonesia: Challenges and Reform Efforts. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 728-738.
Sánchez Graells, A. (2018). Public Procurement and the EU Competition Rules. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sharma, D. D., & Bhat, R. (2017). Enhancing Transparency and Accountability in Public Procurement: The Case of India. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6), 588-604.
Sohail, T., & Cavill, S. (2018). Governance and Public Procurement Reform in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan. Journal of Public Procurement, 18(1), 67-94.
Tirole, J. (2015). Procurement and Renegotiation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(3), 1333-1363.
Trepte, P., & Spiess, M. (2016). Public Procurement and Innovation: Resolving the Legal Uncertainties Surrounding Innovation Partnerships. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(4), 626-641.
Williams, A. (2018). Reforming Public Procurement in the European Union: A Quest for Simplicity and Flexibility. European Business Law Review, 29(2), 297-326.
World Bank. (2017). Public Procurement Review. World Bank.
Zouridis, S., & Karré, P. M. (2016). Legal Innovation in European Public Procurement: A Tale of Waiting for Godot? Journal of Law and Society, 43(2), 184-208.
