Evaluasi Kinerja dan Pengukuran Hasil dalam Administrasi Publik: Pendekatan dan Metode Terbaru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37638/sengkuni.3.2.73-78Keywords:
Evaluasi Kinerja, Pengukuran Hasil, Administrasi PublikAbstract
Performance evaluation and outcome measurement are crucial aspects of public administration that play an important role in assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of government policies and programs. In a continuous effort to improve public services and meet public expectations, new approaches and methods have been introduced. This article will review some innovative approaches to performance evaluation and outcome measurement in public administration, and how these approaches can help governments make better decisions and improve public.References
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Urban Institute.
Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Jossey-Bass.
Ingraham, P. W., & Donahue, A. K. (2000). Taking Stock: A Critical Assessment of Recent Research on Public Sector Performance and Accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 23(4), 409-436.
de Bruijn, H. (2007). Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Challenges of Imprecise Goals and Multiple Actors. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(1), 31-52.
Neely, A. (1999). The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Now and What Next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 205-228.
Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing Performance: International Comparisons. Routledge.
Kelman, S. (2005). Public Management Needs Help! Towards and (Un)Contested Public Administration. American Review of Public Administration, 35(4), 343-361.
Behn, R. D. (2015). The PerformanceStat Potential: A Leadership Strategy for Producing Results. Brookings Institution Press.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2015). Public Management and Governance. Routledge.
Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 673-696.
Ingraham, P. W., & Romzek, B. S. (1999). Accountability and Performance: Toward a Theory of Accountability in the Public Sector. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public Management and Governance (pp. 207-229). Routledge.
Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (Eds.). (2010). Performance Measurement: Getting Results (2nd ed.). Urban Institute.
Moynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-Based Learning and the Future of Performance Management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203-216.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Georgetown University Press.
Macaulay, S., & Cook, S. (2015). Performance Measurement in Local Government: The How, When, and Why. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(8), 545-554.
Poister, T. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Edwards, L. H. (2013). Advancing the Theory and Practice of Performance Measurement: Five Recommendations. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 433-463.
Bryson, J. M., & Alston, F. K. (2011). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Jossey-Bass.
