Transformasi Organisasi dalam Administrasi Publik: Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Responsivitas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37638/sengkuni.2.2.159-164Keywords:
Transformasi Organisasi, Administrasi PublikAbstract
In an era of ever-changing dynamics, public administration is faced with pressure to continuously improve efficiency and responsiveness in providing services to the public. Organizational transformation has become a crucial strategy in achieving this goal. This article discusses the role of organizational transformation in the context of public administration, focusing on efforts to improve efficiency in bureaucratic processes as well as responsiveness to public needs. In this article, we will describe various methods and strategies that can be used by government agencies to achieve this goal, as well as discuss the challenges that may be faced in the proces
References
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Bryson, J. M. (2005). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole”of”government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066.
Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (1997). The reinventor's fieldbook: Tools for transforming your government. Jossey-Bass.
Rainey, H. G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 130-148.
Lynn, L. E. (2006). Public management: Old and new. Routledge.
O'Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2011). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and network structures. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 670-681.
Kettl, D. F. (2000). The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), 498-511.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Routledge.
Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267-282.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
Thompson, F. M., & Riccucci, N. M. (2012). Transforming public and nonprofit organizations: Stewardship for leading change. Routledge.
Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233-262.
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57.
Bovaird, T. (2005). Public governance: Balancing stakeholder power in a network society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 217-228.
Boyne, G. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory framework. Public Money and Management, 22(1), 33-40.
Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., Jr., & Pollitt, C. (2005). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press.
