FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENGEMBANGAN OBJEK WISATA PELATIHAN GAJAH SEBELAT DESA SUKA BARU KECAMATAN MARGA SAKTI SEBELAT

Henny Aprianty; Aili Herlina; Alexsander Alexsander

doi:10.37638/sengkuni.4.2.333 - 340

Authors

Henny Aprianty Department of Public Administration, Fisipol, Universitas Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin, SH Bengkulu
Aili Herlina Department of Public Administration, Fisipol, Universitas Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin, SH Bengkulu
Alexsander Alexsander Department of Public Administration, Fisipol, Universitas Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin, SH Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37638/sengkuni.4.2.333%20-%20340

Keywords:

Tourism Object, Programme, Sebelat Elephant Training

Abstract

This study aims to describe and understand the factors that influence the development of the Sebelat Elephant Training Tourism Object, Suka Baru Village, Marga Sakti Sebelat District. This study uses a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews and documentation. The informants in this study were the Suka Baru Village Government and the PLG Management who managed the tourism object, and the community as tourists. The results of the study concluded that of the ten factors that influence the development of the Gajah Sebelat training tourist attraction in Suka Baru Village, Marga Sakti Sebelat District, 6 factors that have been well supported, namely tourists, tourist attraction, natural resources, prices, tourism organizations/perpetrators and regional characteristics while the other 4 factors namely accessibility, tourist facilities, human resources and information have not optimally supported the development of the Gajah Sebelat training tourism object, Suka Baru Village, Marga Sakti Sebelat District.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (Edisi Ketiga). Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design (Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed). Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second Edi). University of Nebraska.

James J. Spillane. (2002). Pariwisata Indonesia : Siasat Ekonomi dan Rekayasa Kebudayaan. KANSIUS.

Koentjaraningrat. (2003). Metode-metode penelitian masyarakat. Gramedia.

Lexy J, & Moleong. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v9i1.32167

Masruroh, Rina, Nurhayati, N. (2016). Strategi Pengembangan Parawisata Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Parawisata Di Kabupaten Kuningan. Electronic Journal Politeknik Harapan Bersama Tegal, 1(1), 124–133.

Nugraha, H. P., Indarjo, A., & Helmi, M. (2013). Studi Kesesuaian Dan Daya Dukung Kawasan Untuk Rekreasi Pantai Di Pantai Panjang Kota Bengkulu. Diponegoro Journal of Marine Research, 2(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.14710/jmr.v2i2.2474

Purnawan, H. (2020). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN DANA DESA DI DESA MAKARTITAMA DAN DI DESA ULAK MAS KECAMATAN LAHAT KABUPATEN LAHAT. JurnalPenelitianSosialdan Politik, 9(1), 35–55.

Purnawan, H. (2021). Implementation of Central Government Policy on Priority for the Use of Village Funds in Makartitama and Ulak Mas Villages , Lahat Regency , Indonesia. 06(1), 1–9.

Purnawan, H., Triyanto, D., & Thareq, S. I. (2022). Implementasi Kebijakan Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa di Desa Taba Air Pauh Kabupaten Kepahiang. Perspektif, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i2.5876

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R &Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta. In Bandung:Alfabeta. (p. 118).

Widiyanto, D., Handoyo, J. P., & Fajarwati, A. (2008). Pengembangan Pariwisata Perdesaan (Suatu Usulan Strategi Bagi Desa Wisata Ketingan). Jurnal Bumi Lestari, 8(2), 205–210.