Quality Of Service During The Covid-19 Pandemic At Puskesmas, Karang Jaya District North Musirawas

Authors

  • Davika Amalik Study Program of public administration Faculty of social sciences Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Antonio Imanda Study Program of public administration Faculty of social sciences Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Harius Eko Saputra Study Program of public administration Faculty of social sciences Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37638/sengkuni.2.2.99-108

Keywords:

Quality of Service, Covid 19, Patients, Doctors and Nurses

Abstract

This study intends to determine the quality of service during the Covid-19 pandemic at the Karang Jaya District Health Center, North Musirawas Regency. This study uses a qualitative descriptive research method. The technique used is Accident Cluster Sampling, data collection techniques in this study are Observation, Interview, and Documentation According to Zeithaml et al (1990:63) there are seven dimensions of Service Quality: Tangible (Intangible), Medical equipment in the puskesmas is very lacking To carry out examinations and treatment of patients' illnesses, X-rays and ravid tests are not available, but they are limited in nature, there is only a laboratory for checking blood and patient diseases. So that people are disappointed with the limited facilities at the puskesmas. Reliability (Reliability) Treatments carried out by doctors and nurses are good because they have gone through a careful process starting with measuring body temperature, checking blood pressure and recording patient complaints before being examined by doctors. nurses in the treatment and examination of patients. The nurse in the treatment room and the examination is cool alone nagging with fellow friends so that the patient seems to be ignored, Assurance (Guarantee) Services and treatment carried out by nurses and doctors are not on time in providing services even though the service schedule and examination of patients' illnesses starts at 08 s /d 11:30 pm and Empaty . The services provided by the administration and doctors are very good with a friendly, polite and courteous attitude to greet patients when they pass in front of the patient. Meanwhile, nurses are less friendly and polite in front of patients, nurses do not greet patients in the waiting room at all.

References

Agung, Kurniawan, 2005. Transformasi Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Pembaharuan.

Anton Adiwiyanto, 1997, Manajemen Pelayanan Publik; Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

Azwar, Azrul. 1988. Pengantar Administrasi Kesehatan. Jakarta: PT Binarupa Aksara.

Asrul, Azwar, 1996. Menjaga Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta: PT.Rineke Cipta. Batinggi

Adisasminto, 2007. Beberapa Permasalahan Pembangunan Kesehatan di Indonesia. Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta: PT.Rineke Cipta. Batinggi

Amy Y.S. Rahayu, 1997, Fenomena Sektor Publik dan Era Service Quality. Penerbit Gava Media Yogyakarta.

Berry, Amy YS. Rahayu 1997, Penilaian Kualitas Pelayanan Oleh Konsumen. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Dr.Hardiyansyah, 2018. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Penerbit Gava Media Yogyakarta.

Dedi, Alamsyah, 2011. Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan. Yogyakarta : Nuha. Medika

Davis. Nasution 2005 Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Garvin. M.N. Nasotion ,2005. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Gronroos, Christian, 2001. The Perceived Service Quality Concept – A Mistake?. Managing Service Quality.

Han dan Leong, 1996 Pengertian Pelayanan Holistik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hanjon et.al 2000. Demensi Pelayanan Kesehatan. Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta: PT.Rineke Cipta. Batinggi

Hatmoko. 2006. Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan Dalam Kebidanan. Jakarta: : Trans Info Media..

Hatmoko. 2006. Manajemen Puskesmas. Jakarta : Trans Info Media.

Joseph M. Juran dan M.N. Nasution, 2005, Kualitas, Aparatur dan Pemerintah, Pelayanan. Jakarta:PT. Bumi Aksara.

Koler. J. Supranto. 2001. Kreteria Penentuan Kualitas Jasa Pelayanan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, 1997

Moenir H.A.S. 1992. Manajemen Pelayanan Indonesia. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Moleong, Lexy, 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moenir, 1995. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta:PT. Bumi Aksara.

Moleong, lexy J. 2013. Metode Penelitan Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Philip M.N. Nasotion ,2005. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pasalong. 2008. Teori Administrasi Publik. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Pohan 2003. Pelayanan Kesehatan Yang Berkualitas. Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta: PT.Rineke Cipta. Batinggi

Ratminto dan Septi Winarsih, Atik, 2005. Manajemen Pelayanan, Mismar, Jakarta.

Soekijo Notoatmodjo 2008. Sosiologi Untuk Kesehatan. Salemba Medeka Jakarta.

Sampara, Lukman. 2000. Pengembangan Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Prima. LAN RI. Jakarta.

Supriyanto dan Sugiyanti 2003, Otonomi Daerah ”˜Capacity Building dan Penguata Demokrasi Lokal. Jakarta

Sugianti 1999. Kualitas Pelayanan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Adminitrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2005. Metode Penelitian Adminitrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Soekanto Soejono. 1995. Penilaian Organisasi Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta

Syafie, Kencana Inu. 2001. Pengantar Ilmu Pemerintahan. Bandung: Reflika Aditama.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Adminitrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Trihono. 2005. Manajemen Puskesmas Berbasis Paradigma Sehat. Jakarta: CV. Sagung Seto.

Nomor 36 tahun 2009 tentang kesehatan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat (Puskesmas).

Kemenkes RI. (2020). Situasi Terkini Perkembangan Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19). Retrieved August 31, 2020, from https://covid19.kemkes.go.id/situ asi-infeksi-emerging/info-coronavirus/situasi-terkiniperkembangan-coronavirusdisease-covid-19-31-agustus2020/#.X0y2bNwzZxQ

Published

2021-07-26

Issue

Section

Articles