Analysis Of Indonesia'S Pro Poor Growth Index And Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate 2017-2022

Authors

  • Kartini Kartini Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Ferica Christinawati Putri Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Rizky Agusriyanti Irna Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Sulistya Rini Pratiwi Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Meylin Rahmawati Universitas Borneo Tarakan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37638/bima.4.2.165-172

Keywords:

Growth, Pro Poor, Inequality

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether Indonesia is included in the pro poor, trickle down, or anti pro poor growth. The population of this study is all provinces in Indonesia in 2017-2022. Data collection techniques used are documentation and observation, in addition to the use of secondary data to answer research questions. The analytical tool used in this study is statistical analysis using the Pro Poor Growth Index (PPGI) and Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) methods. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia is classified as pro-poor growth where the benefits of growth are greater for the poor than non-poor people so that growth can help reduce poverty in Indonesia.

References

Akita, T. and Miyata, S. (2020) ”˜Assesing Pro-poorness f Regional Economics Growth : Evidence from Indonesia , 2004-2014’, IUJ Research Institute, pp. 2004–2014.

Basin, P.- (2006) ”˜P overty Centre Working Paper’, World, (45), pp. 20–21.

Bourguignon, F. (2003) ”˜The Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle’, pp. 1–35.

Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2002) ”˜Growth is Good for the Poor’, Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: Prospects for Pro-poor Economic Development, pp. 195–225. doi: 10.1093/0199268657.003.0002.

Eastwood, R. and Lipton, M. (2000) ”˜Pro-poor Growth and Pro-growth Poverty Reduction: Meaning, Evidence, and Policy Implications’, 18(2), pp. 22–58.

Fosu, A. K. (2017) ”˜Growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in developing countries: Recent global evidence’, Research in Economics. Elsevier Ltd, 71(2), pp. 306–336. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2016.05.005.

Kakwani, N. et al. (2000) ”˜What is Pro-poor Growth?’, (January 2000).

Kakwani, N., Prakash, B. and Son, H. (2000) ”˜Growth, inequality, and poverty: An introduction’, Asian Development Review, 18(2), pp. 1–21.

Nanak Kakwani , Hyun H . Son, S. K. . Q. and G. . M. . A. (2004) ”˜Pro-poor Growth : Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies’, The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), pp. 417–444.

Ravallion, M. (1997) ”˜Can high-inequality developing countries escape absolute poverty?’, Economics Letters, 56(1), pp. 51–57. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1765(97)00117-1.

Son, H. H. and Kakwani, N. (2008) ”˜Global Estimates of Pro-Poor Growth’, World Development, 36(6), pp. 1048–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002.

Squire, M. L. and L. (1999) ”˜HE SIMULTANEOUS EVOLUTION OF GROWTH AND INEQUALITY Mattias Lundberg and Lyn Squire ∗ December 1999’, (December).

Sumarto, S. and de Silva, I. (2014) ”˜Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle: The Case of Indonesia’, MPRA Paper, 57135(57135).

Downloads

Published

2023-10-17

Issue

Section

Reasearch Paper