Measuring Bank Efficiency and Productivity Using DEA and Malmquist Index: A Case Study of NTB Syariah Bank’s Pre- and Post-Conversion Performance

Authors

  • Sunardi Sunardi Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Muh. Salahuddin Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Edi Muhamad Jayadi Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37638/bima.6.1.393-402

Keywords:

Bank NTB Syariah, Productivity, Efficiency

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the performance of Bank NTB Syariah by measuring efficiency and productivity before and after conversion. Methodology: This study uses a quantitative method with a non-parametric approach. The data analysis technique to measure efficiency uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) with MAXDEA software. The data analysis technique to measure productivity uses the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) with DEAP software. Results: The level of productivity of Bank NTB Syariah before the conversion experienced a decrease in productivity, while after the conversion, there was an increase in productivity. Findings: The factor that plays the most role in changes in the productivity of Bank NTB Syariah is the technological change factor (TECHCH). Novelty: The measurement results based on the Malmquist productivity index show that Bank NTB Syariah's productivity levels before and after conversion were different. Before the conversion, productivity decreased, while after the conversion, it increased. The measurement results based on data envelopment analysis show that Bank NTB Syariah's efficiency levels are classified as efficient before and after the conversion. Originality: This study analyzes the productivity and efficiency of Islamic banks before and after the conversion. Conclusion: Bank NTB Syariah must continue to develop and adopt various technologies in order to continue to increase productivity. Type of Paper: Empirical research paper.

References

Ariff, M., & Can, L. (2008). Cost and profit efficiency of Chinese banks: A non-parametric analysis. China Economic Review, 19(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2007.04.001

Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6

Casu, B., Girardone, C., & Molyneux, P. (2004). Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(10), 2521–2540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.10.014

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer.

Djayusman, R. R., & Abdillah, M. K. (2015). Analisis Efisiensi Lembaga Amil Zakat terhadap Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Islamic Ecomonics Journal, 1(2).

Drake, L., & Howcroft, B. (2002). An Insight into the Size Efficiency of a UK Bank Branch Network. Managerial Finance, 28(9), 24–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350210768040

Fonseka, M., & Farooque, O. Al. (2024). Banking efficiency, ownership types, and operations: A quasi-natural experiment of conventional and Islamic banks. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.101882

Hadad, M. D., Hall, M. J. B., Kenjegalieva, K. A., Santoso, W., & Simper, R. (2011). Productivity Chnages and Risk Management in Indonesian Banking: a Malmquist Analysis. Journal Applied Financial Economics., 21(12).

Juliza Hidayati. (2005). Analisis kinerja bank dengan DEA. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 6(2), 17–23.

Keuangan, O. J. (2020). SPS Perbankan Syariah 2020. In Administrasi, Departemen Perizinan dan Informasi Perbankan Deputi Direktur Publikasi dan.

Lestari, A. (2015). Efisiensi Kinerja Keuangan Badan Amil Zakat Daerah (Bazda): Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 16(2).

Muharam, H. (2007). Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi Bank Syariah di Indonesia Dengan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis (periode Tahun 2005). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, II(3), 80–166.

Munteanu, A., Brezeanu, P., & Badea, L. (2013). Productivity change patterns in the Romanian banking system – the impact of size and ownership on total factor productivity. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XX(6).

Nofinawati, N. (2015). Perkembangan Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 14(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v14i2.305

Norfitriani, S. (2016). Analisis Efisiensi dan Produktivitas Bank Syariah di Indonesia Sebelum dan Sesudah Spin Off. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia, 6(2), 134–143. http://ejournal.almaata.ac.id/index.php/JESI/article/view/430

Sunarsih. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Efisiensi Perbankan Syari’ah dan Konvensional di Indonesia. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 51(1).

Suseno, P. (2008). Analisis efisiensi dan skala ekonomi pada industri perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Journal of Islamic and Economics, 2(1), 35–55.

Sutan Emir Hidayat, Dewandaru, G., Quraisy, M., Nurzaman, M. S., Samidi, S., Sari, C. A., Permata, A., & Hidayati, N. (2020). Trend Konversi Ke Bank Syariah: Tingkatkan Efisiensi dan Produktivitas Bisnis. Komite Nasional Keuangan Syariah, 8, 18.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Reasearch Paper